RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2020, No. 3, P. 219–230


RESISTANCE FACTORS OF A SIBERIAN FIR TO POLYGRAPHUS PROXIMUS BARK BEETLE
N. M. Debkov1, E. M. Bisirova1,2

1Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological Systems, SB RAS
Academichesky ave 10/3, Tomsk, 634055, Russia
2All-Russian Center of Plants Quarantine, Tomsk branch
Frunze ave, 109A, Tomsk, 634069, Russia
E-mail: nikitadebkov@yandex.ru


Received 19 April 2018
The beginning of the XXI century was characterized by an increasing number of biological invasions. The biggest threat of them all poses the xylophilic entomophauna, that leads to the forest ecosystems overall degradation, especially in terms of biodiversity. Siberia currently suffers from Polygraphus proximus Blandf. (Ussuri polygraph beetle) invasion into Siberian fir forests (Abies sibirica Ledeb.). The goal of this research was to assess the factors contributing to the resistance of Siberian fir to Ussury polygraph beetle in West-Siberian invasion region. The major factors chosen were the following ones: tree’s age, trunk’s diameter, central rot presence, bark thickness and growth stress. The main reason for choosing those specific factors is their convenience for the express-test of fir forests resistance to the invader. As a result, a reliable difference was found in mean trunks diameter (Mann-Whitney, р = 0.0068 < 0.05), bark thickness (р = 0.0002 < 0.05) and growth stress (р = 0.0087 < 0.05) of affected and non-affected trees. Living trees in the breeding grounds of the invader usually have a larger trunk (>30 cm in diameter) and thicker bark (8-10 mm) while also having the lower growth stress (1.20). No significant differences were found in the age of affected trees (р = 0.9799 > 0.05). Central rot presence was also found to lack any significant correlation with the invader attacks (р = 0.1995 > 0.05), but in heavier affected forest stands trees with a central rot would be attacked by Ussuri polygraph more often than healthy ones. Sustainable communities usually are affected by central rot only slightly, and are characterized also by more significant age variation and stretched distribution of tree trunks’ by diameter and bark thickness.
Keywords: Siberian fir, Abies Sibirica, Ussuri polygraph beetle, Polygraphus proximus, xylophages invasions, forests resistance, Western Siberia
Acknowledgements: This study was carried out with a financial support from RFBR (16-44-700782 р-а).
DOI: 10.31857/S0024114820020059


REFERENCES



  • Bacon S.J., Bacher A., Aebi S., Gaps in border controls are related to quarantine alien insect invasions in Europe, PLOS one, 2012, Vol. 7, No. 10, pp. 1–9.

  • Baranchikov Y.N., Astrakhantseva N.V., Shchurov V.I., Aleksandrova M.S., Mukhina L.N., Seraya L.G., Pashenova N.V., Sklereidy floemy kak vozmozhnyi faktor ustoichivosti pikht k atakam invazionnogo koroeda (Phloem sclereids as possible factor of firs resistance to invasive bark beetle attacks), Interekspo Geo-Sibir', Novosibirsk, April 8-18, 2014a, Novosibirsk: Sibirskaya gosudarstvennaya geodezicheskaya akademiya, 2014, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 277–282.

  • Baranchikov Y.N., Demidko D.A., Laptev A.V., Pet'ko V.M., Dinamika otmiraniya derev'ev pikhty sibirskoi v ochage ussuriiskogo poligrafa (Dynamics of Siberian fir dieback in the outbreak area of the four-eyed fir bark beetle), Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa – Lesnoi vestnik., 2014b, No. 6, pp. 132–138.

  • Baranchikov Y.N., Pet'ko V.M., Astapenko S.A., Akulov E.N., Krivets S.A., Ussuriiskii poligraf – novyi agressivnyi vreditel' pikhty v Sibiri (Ussury polygraph beetle - a new aggressive pest of Siberian fir), Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa – Lesnoi vestnik, 2011, No. 4, pp. 78–81.

  • Bleiker K.P., Lindgren B.S., Maclauchlan L.E., Characteristics of subalpine fir susceptible to attack by western balsam bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2003, Vol. 33 (8), pp. 1538–1543.

  • Chernova N.A., Transformatsiya rastitel'nogo pokrova pikhtovykh lesov pod vliyaniem ussuriiskogo poligrafa (Transformation of vegetation inTomsk region Siberian fir forests under the influence of Polygraphus proximus Blandf), Interekspo Geo-Sibir', Novosibirsk, April 8–18, 2014, Novosibirsk, Sibirskaya gosudarstvennaya geodezicheskaya akademiya, Vol. 3, No.2, pp. 271–277.

  • Debkov N.M., Zakonomernosti izmeneniya struktury pikhtovykh lesov, povrezhdennykh v rezul'tate invazii ussuriiskogo poligrafa (Regularities of changes in the structure of fir forests damaged as a result of the invasion of Polygraphus proximus), Lesotekhnicheskii zhurnal, 2018, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 13–22.

  • Donyakina S.S., Kovalev A.V., Tarasova O.V., Pal'nikova E.N., Astapenko S.A., Sukhovol'skii V.G., Ustoichivost' pikhty sibirskoi k ksilofagam: sopostavlenie vizual'nykh i instrumental'nykh otsenok (The stability of fir trees to xylophages: comparison of visual and instrumental estimations), Khvoinye boreal'noi zony., 2013, Vol. ХХХI, No. 3–4, pp. 26–30.

  • Dukes J.S., Pontius J., Orwig D., Garnas J.R., Rodgers V.L., Brazee N., Cooke B., Theoharides K.A., Stange E.E., Harrington R., Ehrenfeld J., Gurevitch J., Lerdau M., Stinson K., Wick R., Ayres M., Responses of insect pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: What can we predict?, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2009, Vol. 39 (2), pp. 231–248.

  • Floyd M.L., Clifford M., Cobb N.S., Hanna D., Delph R., Ford P., Turner D., Relationship of stand characteristics to drought-induced mortality in three Southwestern piñon-Juniper woodlands, Ecological Applications, 2009, Vol. 19 (5), pp. 1223–1230.

  • Gninenko Y.I., Klyukin M.S., Ussuriiskii koroed na territorii Rossii (Polygraphus proximus in the territory of Russia), Zashchita i karantin rastenii, 2011, No. 11, pp. 32–34.

  • Gninenko Y.I., Shiryaeva N.V., Shchurov V.I., Samshitovaya ognevka – novyi invazivnyi organizm v lesakh rossiiskogo Kavkaza (Box tree moth – a new invasive organism in forests of the Russian Caucasus), Karantin rastenii. Nauka i praktika, 2014, No. 1 (7), pp. 32–36.

  • Hulme P.E., Pysek P., Nentwig W., Vila M., Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union?, Science, 2009, Vol. 324, pp. 40–41.

  • Koch F.H., Yemshanov D., Colunga-Garcia M., Magarey R.D., Smith W.D., Potential establishment of alien-invasive forest insect species in the United States: where and how many?, Biological Invasions, 2011, Vol. 13 (4), pp. 969–985.

  • Krivets S.A., Bisirova E.M., Kerchev I.A., Pats E.N., Chernova N.A., Transformation of taiga ecosystems in the Western Siberian invasion focus of four-eyed fir bark beetle Polygraphus proximus Blandford (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae), Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 2015, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 94–108.

  • Krivets S.A., Kerchev I.A., Bisirova E.M., Pashenova N.V., Demidko D.A., Pet'ko V.M., Baranchikov Yu.N., Ussuriiskii poligraf v lesakh Sibiri (rasprostranenie, biologiya, ekologiya, vyyavlenie i obsledovanie povrezhdennykh nasazhdenii) (Four - eyed fir bark beetle in Siberian forests (distribution, biology, ecology, detection and survey of damaged stands)), Tomsk: Izdatel'skii dom «UMIUM», 2015, 48 p.

  • Krivets S.A., Kerchev I.A., Bisirova E.M., Pats E.N., Chernova N.A., Demidko D.A., Mukhortova L.A., Pashenova N.V., Pet'ko V.M., Baranchikov Yu.N., Mekhanizmy ekspansii i rol' ussuriiskogo poligrafa v sovremennykh suktsessionnykh protsessakh sibirskoi taigi: itogi trekhletnikh issledovanii (Expansion mechanisms and overall role of Ussury polygraph beetle in modern succession processes of the Siberian Taiga: the results of three-years long studies), The Kataev Memorial Readings – VIII. Pests and Diseases of Woody Plants in Russia, Proc. of the International Conference, St. Petersburg, November 18–20, 2014, St. Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskii gosudarstvennyi lesotekhnicheskii universitet, 2014, pp. 41–42

  • Ostry M.E., Laflamme G., Katovich S.A., Silvicultural approaches for management of eastern white pine to minimize impacts of damaging agents, Forest Pathology, 2010, Vol. 40, pp. 332–346.

  • Poland T.M., Mccullough D.G., Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource, Journal of Forestry, 2006, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 118–124.

  • Roques A., Kenis M., Lees D., Lopez-Vaamonde C., Rabitsch W., Rasplus J.-Y., Roy D., Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe, BioRisk, 2010, Vol. 4, 1038 p.

  • Straw N.A., Williams D.T., Kulinich O., Gninenko Y.I., Distribution, impact and rate of spread of emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in the Moscow region of Russia, Forestry, 2013, Vol. 86, No. 5, pp. 515–522.

  • Vieilledent G., Courbaud B., Kunstler G., Dhôte J.-F., Clark J.S., Biases in the estimation of size-dependent mortality models: Advantages of a semiparametric approach, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2009, Vol. 39 (8), pp. 1430–1443.

  • Worrall J.J., Egeland L., Eager T., Mask R.A., Johnson E.W., Kemp P.A., Shepperd W.D., Rapid mortality of Populus tremuloides in southwestern Colorado, USA, Forest Ecology and Management., 2008, Vol. 255, No. 3–4, pp. 686–696.